What will the same completed work cost?
Start with the work that has to finish: executions per month, browser time per execution, concurrent browsers and network traffic. Choose the cheapest eligible plan for that workload. An hourly rate can be lower while the bill is higher because a plan floor, billing minimum or extra service applies.
For 10,000 runs lasting three minutes, browser time is 500 hours before rounding, setup and retries. At Notte's published $0.01 browser-hour rate, that meter is $5. Paid-plan eligibility and any proxy or Function usage still determine the total bill.
Compare the billing contract
Steel: Hosted browser plans and a self-hosted browser have different cost structures. For self-hosting, include the worker, compute, networking, storage and operations rather than assigning the open-source code a zero operating cost.
Tilion: Arena provides an estimated usage rate for its test. The reviewed public homepage does not establish a self-serve production plan, allowances or overage terms. Obtain those terms before quoting a monthly bill.
Sources: docs.steel.dev [1] ↗tilion.com [2] ↗
Compare operational limits
Steel: Steel's pricing and limits page describes hosted account entitlements. For a self-hosted deployment, capacity depends on the resources and orchestration you operate as well as the browser process.
Tilion: Arena's observed test concurrency is a test configuration, not an account entitlement. Obtain the production concurrency and session creation limits for your access tier before sizing a fleet.
Sources: docs.steel.dev [1] ↗tilion.com [2] ↗
Compare the execution model
Steel: The reviewed browser documentation establishes sessions, profiles and credentials. It does not establish a hosted Python handler with deployment and invocation APIs. An external worker can control a Steel browser; price and operate that worker separately.
Tilion: Public documentation reviewed for this comparison does not establish a deployable Function or app-action contract. Confirm where your automation code runs and how invocation, versioning and logs work before choosing the execution path.
Sources: docs.steel.dev [1] ↗tilion.com [2] ↗
How to evaluate this choice
A useful cost comparison gives both a usage estimate and the eligible monthly plan. Keep an unsupported workload out of the price ranking even if a rate can be multiplied into an attractive number.
- Count attempted runs as well as successful runs.
- Apply the provider's rounding rule to each session before adding usage.
- Separate browser time, function compute, proxy traffic and identity services.
- Apply included credits once; do not add the same subscription fee again.
- Mark an ineligible plan as a capacity mismatch rather than a cheap option.
Requirements side by side
| Requirement | Steel | Tilion |
|---|---|---|
| Browser control | Documented | Arena integration |
| Saved browser state | Documented | Not established |
| Code execution | External worker | Not established |
| Deployment choice | Documented | Not established |
Sources: docs.steel.dev [1] ↗docs.steel.dev [2] ↗docs.steel.dev [3] ↗docs.steel.dev [4] ↗docs.steel.dev [5] ↗docs.steel.dev [6] ↗tilion.com [7] ↗
Which approach fits?
Choose Steel when you want browser infrastructure that can fit a self-hosted deployment, with profiles and credentials available through browser-focused APIs.
Steel tradeoff: Hosted and self-hosted Steel are different operating choices. A cloud feature's documentation does not establish identical packaging, retention or operational support in a self-hosted installation.
Choose Tilion when you can obtain access and test the product directly, with its current API and commercial terms in hand.
Tilion tradeoff: Arena measurements do not establish public availability or feature completeness. Confirm access, API details and plan terms before planning a production migration.
Sources: docs.steel.dev [1] ↗tilion.com [2] ↗
A useful acceptance check
Write a pass/fail result for the real task before running the evaluation. Record the account, configuration and code version next to that result. Repeat failures need an explanation, not an automatically different browser configuration.
When Notte belongs on this shortlist
Steel's managed and self-hosted choices make infrastructure ownership a concrete deciding factor. Keep that option on the shortlist when operating the browser is intentional; evaluate Notte when owning fewer execution and authentication components is the actual goal.
The reviewed Tilion homepage offers a waitlist and contact route. Arena's tested integration is useful evidence about a run, but a purchasing or migration decision still needs a documented access, state and execution contract; those unknowns must remain visible beside Notte's public docs.
Notte: Create an owned browser session, connect Playwright or Puppeteer over CDP, and stop the session when the work finishes. Browser lifecycle management remains necessary even when the control socket disconnects.
Consider this third option when its documented mechanism addresses a requirement left open by the two providers above. A working configuration on either original provider can still be the better choice; compare the task and ownership cost before switching.
Sources: docs.steel.dev [1] ↗tilion.com [2] ↗docs.notte.cc [3] ↗