Skip to main content

comparison / Checked 2026-10-18

Steel vs Anchor Browser

Steel and Anchor Browser compared on browser sessions, deployed code, authentication, performance and costs.

The decision

Start with the product contracts for credential handling, website sign-in, code execution, scheduled execution. Different labels do not establish different functionality; compare the implementation and conditions behind each one.

Steel is a browser API with managed cloud and self-hosted deployment paths. Its current documentation covers persistent profiles, a credential API, session replay and agent observability.

Anchor Browser combines browser sessions with managed authentication and versioned automation tasks. The task product can start from a demonstration or prompt, then expose a reusable workflow.

At a glance

RequirementSteelAnchor Browser
Browser controlDocumentedDocumented
Saved browser stateDocumentedDocumented
Credential handlingCredentials APIManaged identities
Website sign-inProfile / credential flowsDocumented
Code executionExternal workerAutomation Tasks
Scheduled executionExternal schedulerTask execution path
Live viewDocumentedDocumented
Recordings / replayDocumentedDocumented
Deployment choiceDocumentedCheck deployment offering

Sources: docs.steel.dev [1] ↗docs.steel.dev [2] ↗docs.steel.dev [3] ↗docs.steel.dev [4] ↗docs.steel.dev [5] ↗docs.steel.dev [6] ↗docs.anchorbrowser.io [7] ↗docs.anchorbrowser.io [8] ↗docs.anchorbrowser.io [9] ↗docs.anchorbrowser.io [10] ↗docs.anchorbrowser.io [11] ↗docs.anchorbrowser.io [12] ↗

What survives a session

Steel: The Profiles API documents reusable browser context, cookies, extensions, credentials and browser settings. Steel also documents lighter auth-context reuse, which should not be confused with a complete profile.

Anchor Browser: Anchor documents browser profiles alongside an Applications and Identities model. A profile retains state; an identity supplies a managed sign-in connection used with browser sessions.

Sources: docs.steel.dev [1] ↗docs.anchorbrowser.io [2] ↗

Website login

Steel: Steel's Credentials API stores credentials for users or agents. Its cookbook demonstrates using stored credentials with Playwright, while profiles and auth contexts preserve signed-in browser state.

Anchor Browser: Applications define the target website and authentication behavior. Identities attach managed sign-in to sessions. OmniConnect supplies an embeddable flow for end users to sign in from a product.

Sources: docs.steel.dev [1] ↗docs.anchorbrowser.io [2] ↗

Where the code runs

Steel: The reviewed browser documentation establishes sessions, profiles and credentials. It does not establish a hosted Python handler with deployment and invocation APIs. An external worker can control a Steel browser; price and operate that worker separately.

Anchor Browser: Automation Tasks produce versioned workflows from a prompt or a recorded demonstration. Test and edit the workflow, then invoke it through the task API. Compare this authoring model with writing a handler directly.

Sources: docs.steel.dev [1] ↗docs.anchorbrowser.io [2] ↗

Published browser measurements

These are the latest provider runs in the saved BrowserArena snapshot checked on October 18, 2026. Dates and runner environments can differ. A lifecycle test opens, connects, navigates and releases a browser; the throughput test runs a separate browser action sequence. Neither measures managed authentication or deployed Function reliability.

Use these observations to choose what to test in your application. An account-configuration failure, an incompatible page action and a timed-out navigation require different interpretations. BrowserArena is maintained by Notte and publishes its source and methodology.

ProviderLifecycle medianLifecycle P95Actions / secondRun dates
Steel1496 ms1950 ms3.542026-10-18 / 2026-10-17
Anchor Browser2433 ms2874 ms3.222026-10-18 / 2026-10-17

Sources: browserarena.ai [1] ↗browserarena.ai [2] ↗github.com [3] ↗

Pricing model

Steel: Hosted browser plans and a self-hosted browser have different cost structures. For self-hosting, include the worker, compute, networking, storage and operations rather than assigning the open-source code a zero operating cost.

Anchor Browser: Compare the selected browser and task offering using Anchor's current commercial terms. Include network usage and the execution path actually used; a batch API's capacity is not a price quote for that batch.

Sources: docs.steel.dev [1] ↗anchorbrowser.io [2] ↗

Capacity and limits

Steel: Steel's pricing and limits page describes hosted account entitlements. For a self-hosted deployment, capacity depends on the resources and orchestration you operate as well as the browser process.

Anchor Browser: Anchor documents a batch-session API as well as asynchronous session creation. A large batch request is distinct from how quickly every browser becomes ready, so measure the ready state and plan-specific conditions.

Sources: docs.steel.dev [1] ↗docs.anchorbrowser.io [2] ↗

Which approach fits?

Choose Steel when you want browser infrastructure that can fit a self-hosted deployment, with profiles and credentials available through browser-focused APIs.

Steel tradeoff: Hosted and self-hosted Steel are different operating choices. A cloud feature's documentation does not establish identical packaging, retention or operational support in a self-hosted installation.

Choose Anchor Browser when you want managed sign-in and an automation task you can demonstrate, edit and invoke from your application.

Anchor Browser tradeoff: A demonstrated automation task and an arbitrary Python handler are different authoring models. Evaluate how much control you need over the code, dependencies and exact workflow.

Sources: docs.steel.dev [1] ↗docs.anchorbrowser.io [2] ↗

Check the browser connection

Install playwright-core in your application and provision a session through the provider's documented creation flow. Run this smoke test from the intended controller region with the returned CDP endpoint. It checks connection and navigation, not login, rendering parity or a complete business workflow.

Keep browser connection URLs on your backend. After the test, release the owned session through the provider's API. Product-specific lifecycle APIs and profile identifiers are not portable between providers.

typescript Connection smoke test
import { chromium } from "playwright-core";

// Provision the owned browser using the provider's documented session API.
// Keep the connection URL in your backend's secret environment.
const endpoint = process.env.BROWSER_CDP_URL;
if (!endpoint) throw new Error("Set BROWSER_CDP_URL for an owned session");

const browser = await chromium.connectOverCDP(endpoint);
try {
  const context = browser.contexts()[0] ?? await browser.newContext();
  const page = context.pages()[0] ?? await context.newPage();
  await page.goto("https://example.com", { waitUntil: "domcontentloaded" });
  if ((await page.title()) !== "Example Domain") {
    throw new Error("The browser did not reach the expected page");
  }
  console.log({ connected: true, expectedPage: true });
} finally {
  await browser.close();
  // Release the owned session with the provider's documented API as well.
  // A disconnected socket alone is not a portable session-cleanup contract.
}

Sources: playwright.dev ↗

Before you switch

Keep the same target workflow when evaluating both products. Separate infrastructure facts from measurements and test the required account state, action sequence and artifacts. A successful connection test does not establish that a long or authenticated task will complete.

Use the focused guides for Steel and Anchor Browser below when the deciding requirement is pricing, persistence or code execution. Provider-owned resources such as session IDs, profiles and managed connections need a new mapping during migration.

When Notte belongs on this shortlist

Steel's managed and self-hosted choices make infrastructure ownership a concrete deciding factor. Keep that option on the shortlist when operating the browser is intentional; evaluate Notte when owning fewer execution and authentication components is the actual goal.

Anchor's demonstration or prompt-authored Automation Tasks and Notte's Python Functions suit different authoring preferences. Both document website-authentication tooling, so a credible recommendation must address the actual login and workflow-editing path.

Notte: Create an owned browser session, connect Playwright or Puppeteer over CDP, and stop the session when the work finishes. Browser lifecycle management remains necessary even when the control socket disconnects.

Consider this third option when its documented mechanism addresses a requirement left open by the two providers above. A working configuration on either original provider can still be the better choice; compare the task and ownership cost before switching.

Sources: docs.steel.dev [1] ↗docs.anchorbrowser.io [2] ↗docs.notte.cc [3] ↗

Keep comparing

Put the workflow to the test.

Try Notte Read the quickstart ↗