Skip to main content

comparison / Checked 2026-10-18

Notte vs Lightpanda

Notte and Lightpanda compared on browser sessions, deployed code, authentication, performance and costs.

The decision

This comparison includes an engine choice. Notte's browser workflow and Lightpanda's engine should run the same required pages and actions before a hosting or cost decision. A successful CDP connection is not proof of equivalent rendering, screenshots or authenticated site behavior.

Notte combines cloud browser sessions with deployed Python automations and website authentication tools. You can control the browser over CDP or use Notte's actions, then deploy repeated work as a Function.

Lightpanda is a browser engine built for automation, with a hosted cloud offering. It is an engine choice as well as a hosting choice, so evaluate the site's behavior and the browser APIs your workflow uses.

At a glance

RequirementNotteLightpanda
Browser controlDocumentedCompatibility-dependent
Saved browser stateDocumentedNot established
Credential handlingDocumentedApplication-owned
Website sign-inDocumentedNot established
Code executionPython FunctionsExternal worker
Scheduled executionNativeExternal scheduler
Live viewDocumentedCheck engine support
Recordings / replayDocumentedNot established
Deployment choiceEnterprise optionsEngine available

Sources: docs.notte.cc [1] ↗docs.notte.cc [2] ↗docs.notte.cc [3] ↗docs.notte.cc [4] ↗docs.notte.cc [5] ↗docs.notte.cc [6] ↗lightpanda.io [7] ↗

What survives a session

Notte: Profiles save cookies, local storage and session storage. Sessions start with fresh state by default. Persisting a profile writes state back when the session ends; a running session can also save its state explicitly.

Lightpanda: The reviewed cloud documentation does not establish a durable profile contract covering cookies and web storage. Determine how the required browser state is saved and restored before moving an authenticated workflow.

Sources: docs.notte.cc [1] ↗lightpanda.io [2] ↗

Website login

Notte: Vaults substitute credential placeholders in supported browser actions outside the model context. Managed Auth checks requested saved connections before automation. Personas supply an inbox and optional phone number for verification workflows.

Lightpanda: Browser engine compatibility and website authentication are separate requirements. The reviewed sources do not establish a managed website-auth connection equivalent; verify the login and verification flow on the target sites.

Sources: docs.notte.cc [1] ↗lightpanda.io [2] ↗

Where the code runs

Notte: Functions deploy Python code with a run() entry point. Invoke them over HTTP or with an SDK, inspect run history, and roll back code by redeploying an earlier version as the latest version.

Lightpanda: The reviewed documentation establishes a browser engine and hosted access, not a deployed Python Function contract. A separate automation process must have its own deployment, triggers and monitoring design.

Sources: docs.notte.cc [1] ↗lightpanda.io [2] ↗

Published browser measurements

These are the latest provider runs in the saved BrowserArena snapshot checked on October 18, 2026. Dates and runner environments can differ. A lifecycle test opens, connects, navigates and releases a browser; the throughput test runs a separate browser action sequence. Neither measures managed authentication or deployed Function reliability.

Use these observations to choose what to test in your application. An account-configuration failure, an incompatible page action and a timed-out navigation require different interpretations. BrowserArena is maintained by Notte and publishes its source and methodology.

ProviderLifecycle medianLifecycle P95Actions / secondRun dates
Notte332 ms451 ms3.142026-10-18 / 2026-10-18
Lightpanda488 ms550 ms3.612026-10-18 / 2026-10-18

Sources: browserarena.ai [1] ↗browserarena.ai [2] ↗github.com [3] ↗

Pricing model

Notte: The public usage rates are $0.01 per browser-hour, $0.05 per Function-hour and $10 per GB of managed proxy traffic. Paid plans return their price as usage credits. Price the relevant meters and plan eligibility for the workload.

Lightpanda: Use the cloud billing unit and account limits for hosted access. A lower rate only helps if the target pages and required actions complete correctly on the selected engine.

Sources: notte.cc [1] ↗lightpanda.io [2] ↗

Capacity and limits

Notte: The public plans list 5, 25 and 100 concurrent browser sessions, with custom limits on Enterprise. Session duration and concurrent capacity are separate plan limits; a larger technical API limit does not override the plan.

Lightpanda: Use Lightpanda Cloud's limits and billing documentation for hosted capacity. Self-operated engine instances have a different capacity model and should not inherit cloud account assumptions.

Sources: notte.cc [1] ↗lightpanda.io [2] ↗

Which approach fits?

Choose Notte when your browser workflow needs saved logins, credential fill or scheduled Python code alongside the browser.

Notte tradeoff: A saved profile restores browser state; it does not prove that a website still considers the user signed in. Use Managed Auth when the workflow needs connection readiness before it starts.

Choose Lightpanda when your workflow can use Lightpanda's supported browser APIs and you want to evaluate that engine on the pages you actually automate.

Lightpanda tradeoff: CDP connectivity does not establish complete Chromium compatibility. Validate rendering-dependent steps, downloads and browser features with the selected engine before a migration.

Sources: docs.notte.cc [1] ↗lightpanda.io [2] ↗

Check the browser connection

Install playwright-core in your application and provision a session through the provider's documented creation flow. Run this smoke test from the intended controller region with the returned CDP endpoint. It checks connection and navigation, not login, rendering parity or a complete business workflow.

Keep browser connection URLs on your backend. After the test, release the owned session through the provider's API. Product-specific lifecycle APIs and profile identifiers are not portable between providers.

typescript Connection smoke test
import { chromium } from "playwright-core";

// Provision the owned browser using the provider's documented session API.
// Keep the connection URL in your backend's secret environment.
const endpoint = process.env.BROWSER_CDP_URL;
if (!endpoint) throw new Error("Set BROWSER_CDP_URL for an owned session");

const browser = await chromium.connectOverCDP(endpoint);
try {
  const context = browser.contexts()[0] ?? await browser.newContext();
  const page = context.pages()[0] ?? await context.newPage();
  await page.goto("https://example.com", { waitUntil: "domcontentloaded" });
  if ((await page.title()) !== "Example Domain") {
    throw new Error("The browser did not reach the expected page");
  }
  console.log({ connected: true, expectedPage: true });
} finally {
  await browser.close();
  // Release the owned session with the provider's documented API as well.
  // A disconnected socket alone is not a portable session-cleanup contract.
}

Sources: playwright.dev ↗

Before you switch

Keep the same target workflow when evaluating both products. Separate infrastructure facts from measurements and test the required account state, action sequence and artifacts. A successful connection test does not establish that a long or authenticated task will complete.

Use the focused guides for Notte and Lightpanda below when the deciding requirement is pricing, persistence or code execution. Provider-owned resources such as session IDs, profiles and managed connections need a new mapping during migration.

Keep comparing

Put the workflow to the test.

Try Notte Read the quickstart ↗