Skip to main content

workload / Checked 2026-10-18

Notte vs Kernel for scheduled browser Functions

A deployed browser automation runs at scheduled times without an interactive caller. Compare Notte and Kernel on the mechanism this job needs, the work that would move and a specific acceptance case.

The workflow decision

For scheduled browser Functions, the useful comparison is whether Notte or Kernel can meet the following outcome: Each scheduled attempt has a terminal execution record and a verified business result, and the expected browser cleanup occurs.

Scheduling must specify timezone, overlapping runs, parameters and what happens after a failed execution. A successful schedule trigger is not a successful browser task.

A proposed acceptance case

A recurring job signs in, performs a permitted browser task and records its result without an interactive caller. Overlapping triggers must not create unintended duplicate work.

This is an evaluation design, not a claim that this workflow has been executed successfully on every provider.

Part of the testRequired observation
Controlled inputA test schedule with an explicit timezone, fixed inputs and a destination that exposes whether the operation ran once.
Pass conditionEach scheduled attempt has a terminal execution record and a verified business result, and the expected browser cleanup occurs.
Negative caseLet one test run outlive the next trigger. Inspect the overlap policy and verify the intended number of website changes.
Evidence to retainScheduled time and timezone, execution ID, business result and overlap outcome.

Documented mechanisms, side by side

These labels describe product mechanisms. The linked source and the acceptance case determine whether a mechanism meets this workflow's requirement.

RequirementNotteKernel
Code executionPython FunctionsTypeScript / Python Apps
Scheduled executionNativeApp invocation path
Recordings / replayDocumentedDocumented

Sources: docs.notte.cc [1] ↗docs.notte.cc [2] ↗kernel.sh [3] ↗kernel.sh [4] ↗

Where the code runs

Notte: Functions deploy Python code with a run() entry point. Invoke them over HTTP or with an SDK, inspect run history, and roll back code by redeploying an earlier version as the latest version.

Kernel: Deploy a TypeScript or Python App and expose Actions that callers invoke. Kernel co-locates code with the browser environments the app creates. An Action invocation is the execution unit rather than a bare CDP connection.

Sources: docs.notte.cc [1] ↗kernel.sh [2] ↗

Deployment ownership

Notte: Use a remote browser from your existing process or deploy the browser automation as a Notte Function. These choices put lifecycle, scheduling and monitoring responsibilities in different places.

Kernel: Kernel Apps move the automation process next to the browser. Alternatively, an external process can control a browser through the browser API. Choose based on execution locality and deployment ownership.

Sources: docs.notte.cc [1] ↗kernel.sh [2] ↗

Pricing model

Notte: The public usage rates are $0.01 per browser-hour, $0.05 per Function-hour and $10 per GB of managed proxy traffic. Paid plans return their price as usage credits. Price the relevant meters and plan eligibility for the workload.

Kernel: Use the plan and browser configuration in Kernel's pricing documentation. Managed networking, account allowances and app execution make a browser-hour comparison only one part of the decision.

Sources: notte.cc [1] ↗kernel.sh [2] ↗

What should change the choice?

Notte is a natural candidate when a scheduled Python handler and its browser should share an execution platform. Check schedule behavior and browser duration independently.

Kernel: Kernel's browser-local Apps make execution placement part of the decision. Compare the repeated action path with the proposed Notte controller or Function deployment before concluding that a lifecycle or hourly-rate difference decides the workflow.

Keep an existing scheduler or a provider-native execution language when it already meets the job contract and a Python port would add unnecessary maintenance. A triggered request is not proof of completion.

Sources: docs.notte.cc [1] ↗docs.notte.cc [2] ↗notte.cc [3] ↗kernel.sh [4] ↗kernel.sh [5] ↗kernel.sh [6] ↗

The cost boundary

Use the same attempted work and eligible account capacity in both estimates. The browser-hour rate does not include every proxy, execution or identity meter, and the cost of an incomplete job is still part of the workflow budget.

The workload evidence should include: Scheduled time and timezone, execution ID, business result and overlap outcome.

Sources: notte.cc [1] ↗kernel.sh [2] ↗

Make a bounded pilot

Run a controlled scheduled job, verify its business result and browser cleanup, then inspect the recorded schedule state and execution history.

Use the same authorized account, input and final-state check in each configuration. Treat a missing product contract as an open question; do not turn an undocumented capability into an unsupported claim or a successful test result.

  • Pause the target schedule while replaying a fixed input manually.
  • Verify the Python handler's result and browser cleanup before enabling a canary schedule.
  • Run only one authoritative production schedule during cutover and preserve source run history.

Keep comparing

Put the workflow to the test.

Try Notte Read the quickstart ↗