Skip to main content

migration / Checked 2026-10-18

Move versioned browser deployments from Browserbase to Notte

A migration plan for versioned browser deployments: retain the business check, replace Browserbase's provider-owned resources, and prove the Notte workflow before cutover.

Decide whether this move earns its cost

A team releases a browser automation change, discovers a regression and needs to restore a known implementation while retaining the history of affected runs.

Browserbase's TypeScript Function contract is a reason to retain it when that is the deployed language your team wants. A move to Notte Functions includes a Python execution decision; moving only the browser can leave your existing controller in place.

Notte's Python deployment and run-history layer is relevant when release management belongs with browser execution. Its documented rollback approach redeploys an earlier implementation as the latest version.

Retain another execution platform when its language, dependency packaging or version-selection contract is essential to the application. Similar version numbers do not establish the same invocation semantics.

Keep the result contract stable

Two harmless code versions that return different markers and a recorded invocation for each version.

New runs execute the intended implementation after rollback, while historical runs remain associated with the implementation that actually ran.

Preserve the evidence contract across the move: Deployed implementation marker, invocation configuration, historical run version and rollback result.

Map the workflow's resources

RequirementBrowserbaseNotte
Code executionTypeScript FunctionsPython Functions
Scheduled executionExternal trigger pathNative
Recordings / replayDocumentedDocumented

Sources: docs.browserbase.com [1] ↗docs.browserbase.com [2] ↗docs.notte.cc [3] ↗docs.notte.cc [4] ↗

Deployment ownership

Browserbase: Publish TypeScript Functions through the supported deployment flow. The reviewed Function overview lists us-west-2 availability; this is narrower than assuming every browser region also hosts Functions.

Notte: Use a remote browser from your existing process or deploy the browser automation as a Notte Function. These choices put lifecycle, scheduling and monitoring responsibilities in different places.

Sources: docs.browserbase.com [1] ↗docs.notte.cc [2] ↗

Where the code runs

Browserbase: A Function is TypeScript code published with an entry point. Invocation starts asynchronously, creates a browser, passes its connection URL to the handler, and stores the result, logs and session ID. Function webhooks report status changes.

Notte: Functions deploy Python code with a run() entry point. Invoke them over HTTP or with an SDK, inspect run history, and roll back code by redeploying an earlier version as the latest version.

Sources: docs.browserbase.com [1] ↗docs.notte.cc [2] ↗

Pricing model

Browserbase: Compare the public plan's included browser allowance and overage with the workflow's duration. Include proxy traffic and any separately priced services; an Arena browser-hour estimate does not describe the whole Browserbase bill.

Notte: The public usage rates are $0.01 per browser-hour, $0.05 per Function-hour and $10 per GB of managed proxy traffic. Paid plans return their price as usage credits. Price the relevant meters and plan eligibility for the workload.

Sources: browserbase.com [1] ↗notte.cc [2] ↗

Cut over one responsibility at a time

For this Browserbase-to-Notte migration, keep the business assertion outside provider resource management. Source profile, connection, file and execution IDs are not valid target IDs; use a documented transfer path or establish the corresponding resource in Notte.

Retain source job history and a rollback route until the target pilot passes. A migration checklist is not evidence that saved state or runtime behavior is automatically portable.

  • Save the source implementation and the version behavior callers rely on.
  • Deploy two target implementations with visible markers and record which one runs.
  • Rehearse restoring the earlier implementation before routing production invocations.

Sources: docs.browserbase.com [1] ↗docs.notte.cc [2] ↗docs.notte.cc [3] ↗

A proposed acceptance case

This is an evaluation design, not a claim that this workflow has been executed successfully on every provider.

Part of the testRequired observation
Controlled inputTwo harmless code versions that return different markers and a recorded invocation for each version.
Pass conditionNew runs execute the intended implementation after rollback, while historical runs remain associated with the implementation that actually ran.
Negative caseInvoke after changing the latest deployment and check whether the caller runs a pinned or latest version. The application must not infer the executed version from a filename.
Evidence to retainDeployed implementation marker, invocation configuration, historical run version and rollback result.

A reason to delay or keep the source

Invoke after changing the latest deployment and check whether the caller runs a pinned or latest version. The application must not infer the executed version from a filename.

Browserbase: An identity feature, a persisted Context and a Function secret solve different problems. Select the required combination instead of treating all three as automatic login.

Delay cutover when the target's selected plan, required artifact path or supported website-account flow is not established. Resolve that gap before moving real jobs, even if the rate comparison favors the target.

Sources: docs.browserbase.com [1] ↗notte.cc [2] ↗

Keep comparing

Put the workflow to the test.

Try Notte Read the quickstart ↗